We build AI agents and automations that read, decide and act inside the tools your team already uses, with clear limits on what they can do and a log of everything they did.
Every business has work that follows a pattern but still needs judgement: triaging support tickets, qualifying inbound leads, chasing missing documents, reconciling orders between two systems. AI agents and workflow automation can take a large share of that work, but only if they are connected to the right systems and given clear rules about when to act on their own and when to hand over to a person.
We start by mapping one workflow end to end with the people who do it today, including the exceptions they deal with. Then we decide which steps are plain automation, which need a language model to read or write something, and which must stay with a human. The result might be a support chatbot that resolves common questions from your help centre, or an agent that drafts replies for staff to approve.
Every agent we build has scoped permissions, an approval step for anything risky, and a full log of the inputs, tool calls and outputs behind each action. That makes it possible to review mistakes, tighten rules and expand what the agent handles as confidence grows, instead of switching on a black box and hoping it behaves. Your team stays responsible for the outcome, and the system is built so they can see and correct its work.
Chat assistants for your website, app or WhatsApp that answer from your help centre and order data, collect details, and hand over to a human with the full conversation attached.
Agents that use tools such as your CRM, ticketing system, calendar or database to complete a defined job, like lead qualification, ticket triage or document follow-up.
Rule-based and AI-assisted automations across your SaaS stack, built in n8n, Make or Zapier where that is enough, and as custom code where reliability or volume demands it.
Reading incoming emails, PDFs and forms, extracting the fields that matter, and routing or entering them into the right system with a review queue for low-confidence cases.
An assistant in Slack, Teams or your intranet that answers staff questions from policies, wikis and past tickets, respecting who is allowed to see what.
Dashboards, action logs, spending limits, approval rules and test suites that let you see what agents are doing and change their behaviour safely.
Routine lookups, copy-paste between systems and first drafts move to automation, so your team spends its time on the cases that need a person.
Customers and leads get an accurate answer or acknowledgement at any hour, with a clean handover when the question goes beyond what the agent should handle.
Each step an agent takes is logged with its inputs and reasoning, so you can audit decisions, investigate errors and show reviewers how the system works.
Agents start with narrow permissions and approval gates. As results hold up, you widen what they handle without rebuilding the system.
We sit with the people doing the work, document each step, the systems involved and the exceptions, and agree where automation stops and a human takes over.
We connect the APIs the agent needs with least-privilege access and collect real past cases, including awkward ones, to test the agent against before it touches live work.
The agent runs alongside your team, drafting or suggesting actions without executing them. We compare its output with what staff actually did and adjust rules and prompts.
We switch on autonomous actions for the cases it handles reliably, keep approval for the rest, and review logs with you to decide what it takes on next.
Straight answers about AI Agents & Automation. Anything else? Ask us directly.
Cost is driven by how many systems the agent connects to, how many workflows and exceptions it covers, whether it needs to take actions or only answer questions, and the review and logging your team requires. Model usage and automation platform fees are ongoing costs on top. A discovery call lets us look at your workflow and suggest a sensible first scope.
It depends on access to the systems involved, the number of workflow branches, and how long the shadow-mode pilot needs to run before your team is comfortable. A single, well-defined workflow with good API access moves much faster than a multi-department process. We agree on milestones with you after mapping the workflow.
Usually, yes. Most modern CRMs, help desks, ERPs and communication tools have APIs we can connect to, such as HubSpot, Salesforce, Zendesk, Shopify, Google Workspace and Slack. Older or in-house systems may need a small integration layer or database access. We check this during discovery before promising anything.
Agents only get the permissions their job needs, and actions with real consequences, like refunds, outbound emails or record deletion, can require human approval. We test against past cases before launch, run in shadow mode first, log every action, and set limits on volume and spend. When the agent is unsure, it hands the case to a person.
No-code platforms are a good fit for straightforward flows your team wants to edit themselves. Custom code makes more sense at high volume, when logic gets complex, when you need proper testing and version control, or when data cannot pass through a third-party platform. Many projects combine both, and we recommend based on your workflow.
You own the code, prompts, workflow definitions and logs, delivered into your accounts and repositories. After launch, agents need attention as your tools, policies and model versions change. We document how everything works so your team can maintain it, and we offer ongoing support to monitor, test and extend agents if you prefer.
A short call to understand your goals, constraints and timeline. You leave with a clear next step, with no obligation.